That's absolute bollocks.
What recommendations has Johan Giesecke given to the WHO regarding the current pandemic ?
You can't keep talking out of your arse when you have nothing to back it up.
Now get to work
I believe the WHO just employ Giesecke in a freelance position to make their organisation seem legitimate, it is obvious from the contrast of the WHO's corona strategy to Swedens corona strategy they do not follow Gieseckes scientifically evidence backed strategy.
Last edited by LeonatLarge; 28-04-2020 at 19:31.
Leon you should try therapy. May make you speak to people better
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Works for you most of the time, which statistically is 100% of the time because you understand them fully.
Quick Google:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...673-5/fulltext
Originally Posted by STAG-IH including your boyYou can believe what you want - but I thought you only worked on fact? Or is it fact when it's obvious to you because it suits your belief? How convenient.I believe the WHO just employ Giesecke in a freelance position to make their organisation seem legitimate, it is obvious from the contrast of the WHO's corona strategy to Swedens corona strategy they do not follow Gieseckes scientifically evidence backed strategy.
And I made chilli today
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Last edited by Asht_200; 28-04-2020 at 21:37.
What are you talking about ?
I said Johan Giesecke was one of the top epidemiologists in the world, that is a fact.
You are claiming his freelance work for the WHO has somehow compromised that position, that he is not one of the top epidemiologists in the world. That is incorrect.
Johan Giesecke supports a no lockdown policy regarding the current pandemic, that is a fact.
The WHO's guidelines strongly support lockdowns in the current pandemic, that is a fact.
No he isn’t. You have no idea about epidemics. The best epidemiologists live in this country. FACT. It’s called the Francis Crick Institute , formerly National Institute of Medical Research. Where they invented the Influemza Vaccine . Go crawl back under your rock
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sorry this guy / girl don’t know if it is Leon or Leona. I apologise but I bit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Forced vaccinations are here, a new law was passed on the 27th of April 2020 that means you can be detained, forcibly vaccinated, and then detained and re-educated.
https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status...106080259?s=08
https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status...106080259?s=08
Last edited by LeonatLarge; 29-04-2020 at 09:02.
Being forced to have a vaccination is not new. This is just a modification to the current rules of consent to include Coronavirus.
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/
I cannot speak for the detainment aspect as I didn't know the law before.
So its a conspiracy by Bill Gates (incidentally who's Foundation under the auspice of WHO were intrinsic in stopping the Ebola outbreak) to introduce a vaccine into the world population.
He is doing this, despite already being the 2nd richest man in the world, to make $130 per vaccine and become even richer.
This is despite already putting over $45bn into the Gates Foundation, donating millions to companies producing low cost vaccines and treatments, introducing programmes to combat malnutrition and womens rights. This doesnt sound like the actions of a money focused despot to me.
I love a conspiracy theory as much as anyone, but the common factor is the conspirators always have something to gain. In this case all I can see is death on fairly large and indiscriminate scale, businesses and economies going to shit and governments getting battered on everything from healthcare to taking bad advice, so who is actually benefiting from this conspiracy?
Originally Posted by scimmy benOriginally Posted by sprout
New evidence reveals the coronavirus is far more less deadly than we have been led to believe.
https://www.facebook.com/36855793014...7013/?vh=e&d=n
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the centre for evidence-based medicine, believes infections were at their highest around mid-March - 21 days before the country recorded its worst day for deaths on April 8, and before the lockdown, this proves the lockdown has been ineffective in combating the disease, and is therefore unlawful.
There is up to a month delay between when deaths take place and the deaths being reported and added to the " died with coronavirus " list.
The UK coronavirus bill clearly states that actions should be reasonable, proportionate and backed by scientific evidence.
https://www.phc.ox.ac.uk/team/carl-heneghan
https://mobile.twitter.com/carlheneg...Ctwgr%5Eauthor
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/uk-coronavirus-outbreak-peaked-before-21895937[/url]
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...necessary.html
Last edited by LeonatLarge; 29-04-2020 at 14:33.
He’s a scientist, statistician, virologist, political pundit, an aspiring sith lord and now a lawyer too