I really like the mustang but I’m definitely at the age where I want old cars for the nost***ia
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I really like the mustang but I’m definitely at the age where I want old cars for the nost***ia
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is it genuinely better on fuel than a V8? Other than driving around making rude noises in the V8 which will murder MPG, I wonder if there is much of a difference real world given the mass of the thing?
I do a lot of short journeys (which is why a V8 would be extra bad) and its averaging 26mpg which is what i was expecting. I dont see a V8 getting anywhere near that for the same journey. One would have obviously been nice if this wasnt my daily, but there are worse ways of getting to work![]()
Thats why i went with the NA 2ltr mazda, i do a lot of short trips - my diesel BM was not even half warmed up by the time i got to work.
I get 28-30mpg with stop start short trips, 40+ easy on the open road and hashing the baws off it i still cant go lower than 38mpg.
My s14 was struggling to do 18mpg on the commute, the e190 i had was even worse around 15, the bmw was about 25mpg.
I'm sure 15 yrs ago this thread would have gone off topic to be about bhp or sex by now and not about mpg and the daily commute
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
That colour really suits the car.
2004 - on : 1999 S14a 398bhp 378lb/ft
2010 - on : 2007 RX8 PZ
1998 - 2004 : 1991 S13
HR direct injection head would sort emissions and power ~300bhp. Honda Vtec head on SR20VET made 280bhp 16 years ago, direct injection both cleans up the emissions and increases power.
If they can make 6 mode wheelie/race/tour/rain/snow controls for bikes in a system that weighs less than 1kg they can tame the sideways tendency. Just junking the P6000s for TZ200/300 has gone a very long way to fixing mine (stage 0.5) it's really boring and they last 20K miles instead of 10K.
Now safety that ain't easy. Modern crash test requirements have been driving car design and styling for the last 35 years.
Started with Federal impact bumpers. We had about a decade of shit looking cars. They sorted that by fitting body coloured skins just in time for the S13.
Then they came up with frontal impact testing. Most car makers just gave up and went FWD as engine spread the impact into the bulkhead instead of sliding under or into the car. Had to add weight to stiffen up the chassis.
Then side impact. Cars had to get 6 inches wider to fit a "bumper" all round the car. Increased height of glass-line and reduced glass area. Had to add more weight to stiffen up the chassis laterally. Made people carriers/SUV attractive as they still had glass area and a higher floor that took the impact.
Then ped impact. Front of the car had to get flatter and taller, that raised the bonnet line and scuttle.
-m-0-m- Wot no CD ?
I drove 2 M135i's over the past few weeks. The 8 speed auto is crazy goodThe torque delivery is insane. It's around the same power to weight as the chaser but feels much faster. Chaser is expected to go this week and after that I'll consider my opions.
Looks like I am not the only one who thinks this way
http://www.speedhunters.com/2015/02/...an-s16-silvia/
![]()
It's a good read, that.
Going to be keeping an eye on residuals on these things.
The look of them is really growing on me know. There are a couple that park outside our office and I am loving the blue!
There's a red one drives through our village. It picked up some battle scars a few weeks back, too much manfoot![]()
that will be when they go for 2nd gear,spin the snot out of first stuff it in second and then the thing goes any were but straight
have to admit I see one recently and it had good presence the styling is getting better with time,
see a yellow one in the dealership and that didn't look so good, the darker colour's look better