The notion that bike engines lack torque is idiotic, simply because no one can connect a drive direct from the crank of a bike engine. The ends of bike engine cranks don't have output flanges nor any way to make one. With the exception of a very few bike engines that still cling to vintage engine designs its been a very very long time since the torque at the crank has been available. The only current production engines I can think of that have a sprocket on the crank are Harley Davidson and Royal Enfield. They ALL have primary gears/sprockets to drive the clutch, the clutch basket is the first location that anyone can reasonably connect to to obtain an output.
Hyabusa 1:1.6 primary drive, crank torque 102 lb·ft (138 Nm) @ 7000 rpm
http://www.aperaceparts.com/tech/specshayabusa.html
At the clutch that is 163 lb·ft (220 Nm) @ 4375 rpm.
CA18DET at the clutch 166 lb·ft (228 Nm) @ 4000 rpm.
Power 172.6 bhp @ 9800 rpm = 6125 rpm v's CA18DET 169bhp @ 6400 rpm.
You couldn't tell the difference with a seat of your pants dyno. The "power band" is 650 rpm shorter but the busa has a close ratio 6 speed box.