Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Question for those with photography in raw and photoshop experience

  1. #1
    Member sx rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    2,970
    Rides
    0

    Question for those with photography in raw and photoshop experience

    Strangely I've notice a picture looks better in the PS suite that the normal windows 10 photo viewer? Only started happening recently when I started to shoot in RAW for the first time, files goes from RAW to DNG to open in PS and then when its complete to JPEG. As below there is a marked difference, wierd thing is if I open the same jpeg file in PS it looks good again.

    Any ideas? using cs2 if that helps...


  2. #2
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    Why convert to DNG? Photoshop will open the RAW files

    Ah see you have an "older version"

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    107
    Rides
    0
    Personally I can't see a whole lot of difference in the two images.

    It could be something to do with how Photo Viewer decompresses the image.
    Why not use png? Lossless compression for the win.

  4. #4
    Member sx rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    2,970
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Asht_200 View Post
    Why convert to DNG? Photoshop will open the RAW files

    Ah see you have an "older version"
    Yes its the freebie version

    Quote Originally Posted by fridx View Post
    Personally I can't see a whole lot of difference in the two images.

    It could be something to do with how Photo Viewer decompresses the image.
    Why not use png? Lossless compression for the win.
    Could be, will try saving PNG instead and see what happens. thanks.

  5. #5
    Graphics Guru Davus200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    South West
    Posts
    2,391
    Rides
    0
    I'm guessing both images are in RGB?

    Worth checking the colour profiles are the same. Edit > Assign profile, as this can have a big impact on colour output

  6. #6
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Pontefract
    Posts
    3,042
    Rides
    0
    Potentially an update issue, especially if you're running an "acquired" copy of PS. There was an issue for a while of RAW files looking completely different when opened in PS. It was patched, but I'm not sure I'd advise trying to patch a hooky version.

  7. #7
    Member sx rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    2,970
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Davus200 View Post
    I'm guessing both images are in RGB?

    Worth checking the colour profiles are the same. Edit > Assign profile, as this can have a big impact on colour output
    Something I need to check, thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Garrett_T25 View Post
    Potentially an update issue, especially if you're running an "acquired" copy of PS. There was an issue for a while of RAW files looking completely different when opened in PS. It was patched, but I'm not sure I'd advise trying to patch a hooky version.
    its not a dogde version, I got it when they made it free

  8. #8
    Guest j_veitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Moving up - out of the basement
    Posts
    1,584
    Rides
    0
    I'm going to guess that its the colour space. RAW is just that, so can't be displayed without *some* processing, as you monitor is unlikely to have the same dynamic range. The straight from camera jpg has been processed according to the camera settings (colour space*, sharpness, etc). But when you import from RAW then output to jpg, you need to select the colour space used during the process. I'll bet you are using Adobe RGB, which when you re-open it will display fine in PS, but most other viewers aren't Adobe RGB... so it will look odd. Try sRGB (have a quick read at something like this http://digital-photography-school.co...-colour-space/ )

  9. #9
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Pontefract
    Posts
    3,042
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sx rider r17t View Post
    its not a dogde version, I got it when they made it free
    Ah my mistake! Try the above with regards colour-space first (easiest option) and then check you're all up to date. Report back here if neither of those work and we'll try and work it out!

  10. #10
    Member sx rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    2,970
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by j_veitch View Post
    I'm going to guess that its the colour space. RAW is just that, so can't be displayed without *some* processing, as you monitor is unlikely to have the same dynamic range. The straight from camera jpg has been processed according to the camera settings (colour space*, sharpness, etc). But when you import from RAW then output to jpg, you need to select the colour space used during the process. I'll bet you are using Adobe RGB, which when you re-open it will display fine in PS, but most other viewers aren't Adobe RGB... so it will look odd. Try sRGB (have a quick read at something like this http://digital-photography-school.co...-colour-space/ )
    thanks for this info, will have a check of it when I'm back home.

    Quote Originally Posted by Garrett_T25 View Post
    Ah my mistake! Try the above with regards colour-space first (easiest option) and then check you're all up to date. Report back here if neither of those work and we'll try and work it out!
    ok thanks mate, appreciate your help

  11. #11
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    They are constantly updating Camera RAW

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •