Page 50 of 70 FirstFirst ... 40484950515260 ... LastLast
Results 981 to 1,000 of 1381

Thread: WOT No EU Referendum Thread?

  1. #981
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    Couldn’t agree more with the FPTP being absolutely shocking. Bad enough with the top parties:

    CONS got 13 million votes and 368 seats.
    Labour got 10 million votes and 202 seats.

    But it really gets messed up with the remainder:

    SNP got 1.3 million votes as 48 seats.
    Lib Dem’s got 3.9 million votes and 11 seats. How did that work?
    Greens got 860,000 votes and 1 seat.

    This country needs proportional representation.

  2. #982
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bedford
    Posts
    1,059
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by piman2k View Post
    Will you stop using ‘remoaner’ please. It’s remain voter, remain supporter or Remainer if you must.

    He hasn’t answered my question Ash. All that he’s done is answer what makes it better based around the state of the nation of the past 3 years.

    I though my question was clear, what’s the benefit of Brexit from the context of before the referendum had happened and before the 3.5 years of negotiations, when we were just people. What about Brexit makes someone’s life better from that position? Personally and applicable to their day to day life. Does something get cheaper? Does their job get them a payrise?

    That is my question.

    ‘Its not going to be an easy ride in the short term’. It won’t be short term. And why was it so bad before?

    ‘Come together and move on’. If I lose my job because of Brexit, will you come together and help me with my mortgage? Will your Brexit government?

    ‘Control of our own destiny’. Jesus wept.

    ‘Will of the people’. Will of 52% of the electorate representing around 25% of the population.

    Honestly, it’s all sound bites. Day in, day out. Sound bites.

    I just want an honest, media free, sound bite free, PR free answer to a god damn simple question.
    Well as the chap above posts, all of those reasons. Plus; I'm a euroeceptic. I don't trust our politicians let alone 27 other countries. The layers of it all just make it all very inefficient, before we get onto the corruption and political self motivation by the steering nations. I believe we are better off out of it. To be in control of our laws, our borders etc etc. A points based systems sounds sensible to me...

    Nobody can say we will be better or worse off unless they have a crystal ball. I expect there to be challenges in the short term but that's inevitable with change. In the medium/ long term I believe and it is a belief, that we will do better being out of the EU in the long run. But of course there are many, many variables...

    For your comment on losing your job as a result of Brexit, I lost my job in the last financial crisis. I didn't blame the deregulation of the financial services or sub prime mortgages. Nobody helped me either. You have to help yourself. If you think there's a chance of that, my advice is start taking steps now to make yourself re-empolyable in the event of.... No job is for life in or out of the EU.

    On the will of the people point, If you feel this passionately about it, become an MP and change it. If not, please stop going on about a result 3 plus years ago which seems to have been clarified in the last election. I believe in democracy and we should respect that regardless if you don't agree with the outcomes.

  3. #983
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by piman2k View Post
    Couldn’t agree more with the FPTP being absolutely shocking. Bad enough with the top parties:

    CONS got 13 million votes and 368 seats.
    Labour got 10 million votes and 202 seats.

    But it really gets messed up with the remainder:

    SNP got 1.3 million votes as 48 seats.
    Lib Dem’s got 3.9 million votes and 11 seats. How did that work?
    Greens got 860,000 votes and 1 seat.

    This country needs proportional representation.
    No it doesn’t, because differing parts of the country have different values. Why should the North have more of a day when the majority of the population live in the south and that is where the country’s wealth is. I’m not saying that is right but why? Take British Leyland for example. Largest car company in the world and it was squandered because they couldn’t be bothered to make decent cars and spent most of their time on strike

    I agree it needs a better system, but what that is, I don’t know


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #984
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    Why should we have PR? Because of exactly the situation we are in. We have a government in control of over 55% of the House of Commons but it received only 45% of the votes. It has no actual mandate based on people that voted, but the antiquated FPTP system means that they get it anyway.

    And in a PR system, everyone’s vote would count. If you didn’t vote for the winning party in your constituency as it stands, then your vote counts for nothing. There’s no runner up, there’s nothing.

    So looking at the electorate now, 55% did not vote for the Tories. Yet here they are, in power and untouchable.

    RE Immigration: no one gets in or out of the U.K. without a passport. We have the right under our own law and EU law to send anyone back to Europe who can’t self sustain. But we don’t exercise it. Everything about immigration in the campaign is absolutely possible to do already, we just don’t. Yet that’s allowed to be some campaign headline?!?

  5. #985
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    And Ash, I don’t mean to be funny, but in this case the North DO get more of a say. As near as damn it 50 seats in Scotland are now in the hands of the SNP for 1.3 million votes. It doesn’t work.

  6. #986
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by piman2k View Post
    Why should we have PR? Because of exactly the situation we are in. We have a government in control of over 55% of the House of Commons but it received only 45% of the votes. It has no actual mandate based on people that voted, but the antiquated FPTP system means that they get it anyway.

    And in a PR system, everyone’s vote would count. If you didn’t vote for the winning party in your constituency as it stands, then your vote counts for nothing. There’s no runner up, there’s nothing.

    So looking at the electorate now, 55% did not vote for the Tories. Yet here they are, in power and untouchable.

    RE Immigration: no one gets in or out of the U.K. without a passport. We have the right under our own law and EU law to send anyone back to Europe who can’t self sustain. But we don’t exercise it. Everything about immigration in the campaign is absolutely possible to do already, we just don’t. Yet that’s allowed to be some campaign headline?!?
    Under the current EU laws you don’t need a passport to get in or out if you are travelling from an EU country. I got in from Poland on a driving license.

    We don’t exercise our right to kick people out, you are right, but that isn’t the EU fault no matter how much Farage and etc try to say it is. Germany put a cap and we didn’t. You can’t blame the EU for that. You can blame the Labour government and the Labour Home Secretary who if I remember was in it for switching her houses...

    The Polish have a right to stay here because they helped out in the Battle of Britain. And the rest of the Europeans contribute to our economy. Remember what scummy UK society said. Picking fruit and veg is immigrant work. British youth scum are just too lazy to work


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #987
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    I’m not blaming the EU for us not exercising our rights to restrict movement. I’m blaming the leave campaign for pretending like it wasn’t a thing when it was.

    Unless you can get a ferry into the ROI without a passport then I’m not sure there’s anyway into the U.K. without showing a passport already. Could be wrong tho.
    Last edited by piman2k; 18-12-2019 at 23:13.

  8. #988
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    You didn’t need a passport...x to get into the Uk. I’ve done it before


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #989
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helston, West Cornwall
    Posts
    24,438
    Rides
    0
    Isn't there just a trace of irony in the fact that you are unhappy about how much your vote counts in the FPTP system for referenda and uk government yet you want us to be governed by an unelected body called the EU ?

    And I've been working in the UK for 42 years already so have a fully paid up stamp for my pension
    Last edited by Jonny Wilkinson; 19-12-2019 at 00:02.

  10. #990
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    Everyone keeps moaning about the EU.... what about the House of Lords?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #991
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonny Wilkinson View Post
    Isn't there just a trace of irony in the fact that you are unhappy about how much your vote counts in the FPTP system for referenda and uk government yet you want us to be governed by an unelected body called the EU ?
    But we aren’t. We are governed by our Government. We voluntarily sign into the conditions of the EU in order to get the many, vast benefits that have kept our country going and really rather well.

    I don’t need sound bites to make you realise that inside the EU, as members, we can set the rules and participate. We have elected MEPs and they form part of the EU system.

    I don’t need a sound bite to tell you how few times we have voted against legislation and rules the EU has devised.

    Your obsession with ‘unelected this and that’ is cringeworthy. The Council is heads of states who are elected. The commission is recommendations of the council. The president is nominated but then approved by the Parliament.

    And yes, as Ash repeatedly points out but people keep ignoring, we have a truly unelected top tier in the Lords that no one seems to be crying about.

    Just an edit to add, I still haven’t got any personal benefit or gain reasons for the vote.
    Last edited by piman2k; 19-12-2019 at 09:04.

  12. #992
    Guest R3K1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    12,176
    Rides
    0
    FPTP is flawed in many ways but ultimately it seems to provide a majority government.

    Clearly the last few years have shown us that this country needs a majority government to get anything done, our politicians seem completely incapable of meaningful cooperation.

  13. #993
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    But what’s the point in a majority government if it’s either absolutely marginal or, in this case, unrepresentative of the entire population? If the issue is as divisive as this one, it needs a representative parliament to thrash it out over time and come to an agreement.

    Now we simply have one ‘side’ getting its way.

  14. #994
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by piman2k View Post
    But what’s the point in a majority government if it’s either absolutely marginal or, in this case, unrepresentative of the entire population? If the issue is as divisive as this one, it needs a representative parliament to thrash it out over time and come to an agreement.

    Now we simply have one ‘side’ getting its way.
    But a majority government is supposed to represent the constituency that elected them

    And let’s not forget, the vast majority of people elected UKIP to represent them as MEPs but didn’t realise their policy was not to say anything

    The EU referendum was also marginal, 52% v 48% so stop complaining that nearly half of Westminster don’t like the Brexit deal

    We don’t have 1 side getting it’s way. And BoJo is living in cloud cuckoo land if he thinks Brexit will be done by Jan 31st


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #995
    Guest Asht_200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ashflix.com
    Posts
    22,542
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by R3K1355 View Post
    FPTP is flawed in many ways but ultimately it seems to provide a majority government.

    Clearly the last few years have shown us that this country needs a majority government to get anything done, our politicians seem completely incapable of meaningful cooperation.
    They aren’t supposed to. The opposition is supposed to oppose the will of the government, that is what opposition means


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  16. #996
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    You are completely at ends with what majority means.

    A majority of constituencies won does not represent a majority of voters will.

    That is exactly why FPTP is flawed.

    Look at Bury North. 21,660 CON votes. 21,555 Labour votes. 105 majority. Meaning 21,555 people’s votes now count for absolutely nothing. The seat goes to CON and the house moves on. The seat is not binary, yet it is treated as it is.

    If it worked, you wouldn’t have 4 million people Countrywide being represented by 11 seats in the Lib Dem’s, and 1.3 million people being represented by 48 seats in the SNP.

    The opinion of the country is no less divided than it was before, but just enough tipped the scale. To pretend that this means the country overwhelmingly voted for this government is tantamount to lying.

    Can’t be clearer than that.
    Last edited by piman2k; 19-12-2019 at 13:14.

  17. #997
    Guest ps13ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    194
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by piman2k View Post
    Will you stop using ‘remoaner’ please. It’s remain voter, remain supporter or Remainer if you must.
    haha even moaning about the phrase 'remoaner'

  18. #998
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    21,373
    Rides
    0
    Because it’s derogatory? And we’re trying to keep the discussion polite.

  19. #999
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Nottinghamshire
    Posts
    1,128
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by docwra View Post
    Im sorry, I thought we just had a General Election rather than a second EU referendum, did I miss something? If it was just about Brexit why not just do the second ref and be done with it?
    Id also add that Boris and JRM each voted against Mays deal when it was offered up to them, but they are apparently different from the other MPs that voted against it as they are "Brexiteers" so cant be wrong.

    There arent any bots here either mate, unless of course you are one yourself? I also notice that Boris has now agreed to release the findings of the report into Russian interference, why couldnt he have done that 2 weeks ago?

    Im happy to accept the result and see where we go from here but youve got to tell the whole story, not just the bit that suits your claims. There was a vast amount of misinformation, avoiding questions and downright lying on the part of the Tory party - where you say the globalist left is on its last legs Im considerably more concerned that what small amount of integrity and requirement to justify themselves to the voter our politicians had has now gone, possibly forever.

    The Tory's slogan was "get Brexit done"

    I don't think Liebour had a slogan it was more like " we will have a second referendum with remain light and remain hard on the ballot paper, and then we will campaign against remain light.

    The Unliberal Undemocrats slogan was " stop Brexit "

    Having a second referendum wasn't very popular because many people believed it was undemocratic.

    Mays deal wasn't Brexit it was more like remain light.

    Generally politicians say what the public want to hear during an election, its the same old story every time but nothing changes.

    I believe the election was a good thing for politics and democracy, a lot of MP's who went against their party and constituents lost their jobs, this in my opinion is the best outcome as MP's should serve the people who elected them.

  20. #1000
    Member sx rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    2,970
    Rides
    0
    I am genuinely shocked that so many people think brexit or Tory’s or BJ are good for this country. None of us on this forum as far as I am aware are part of the ruling elite so why on earth do you support this rich get richer ideology? Better red than dead someone mentioned in a post above, wtf?? was said uncle lord of the f*****g manor??

    No deal and or brexit is only good for the rich. End of.

    The referendum was a stupid idea, to put to that decision in the hands of the public was dumb because 99% of us are NOT ECONOMISTS. This whole situation is absurd. It’s literally the blind leading the blind right now.

    There is no democracy, we are misled by a bunch of lying rich Etonians and vote for a 5 year dictatorship.

    We had a real chance with Corbin, possibly the first real potential PM who actually gave a f**k and guess what, the corporate owned media twisted things to let BJ that massive gapping prolapsed a*****e into power.

    I am sickened by it all. The Tory party are for the ruling elite and don’t care about the real people who pay 20% tax.

    Corbyn was going to tax the corporations fairly and correctly. The Tory’s are nothing but the corporations whores who will let them frack, pay no tax and rip us off until we are on our knees. Urg rant over.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •