Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Can i ask turbo type questions as i think ive confused myself...

  1. #1
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0

    Can i ask turbo type questions as i think ive confused myself...

    Hey all.

    Been a while, i know, but ive been lurking and looking.

    I have an alfa 147 these days and its mental. its a 1600cc with a few added bits from the 2L engine that help it breathe.
    BUT....
    I'd like to run a light pressure turbo on it. Circa 5psi. Not a lot i know, but without getting into spacers/pistons and standalone ecu etc it will add a few ponies.

    So i bought a book to try and learn what i need to work out and get some figures made into metal.

    I have, however been over thinking it a bit and confused the crap out of myself....

    Figures:

    VFR:
    1598cc (97.5cu/in)

    97.5cu" x 7500rpm x 90% (volumetric efficiency) / 3456 = 190.4 cubic feet per minute needed.

    I'm looking for 5psi, so Pressure ratio = 5psi+14.7 (sap) =19.7 / 14.7 = 1.34 PR (stop laughing...!)

    Thats 190.4 cu/ft into lbs/min (/13.7) gives me 13.89 lbs/min.

    I cant find a map that i've landed anywhere useful....
    Last edited by Egon; 21-02-2016 at 06:57.

  2. #2
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    Sorry, 2 kids distracting me. Little sods.

    right, i'm looking at maps. Now i've plotted my PR and corrected lbs min on a few maps, namely a gt1544 (43.9mm 56 trim 0.33 ar) and i'm waaaaay off the
    useful lines.

    Do i need to land on the lines of the compressor map? surge is to the left isnt it? and choke is to the right?

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Burton on Trent
    Posts
    11,209
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Egon View Post
    97.5cu" x 7500rpm x 90% (volumetric efficiency) / 3456 = 190.4 cubic feet per minute needed.(
    It's a 4 stroke, it only inhales 1/2 the swept volume each revolution. 1st 1/2 rev 1 sucks, 2nd 1/2 rev 3 sucks, 3rd 1/2 rev 4 sucks, 4th 1/2 rev 2 sucks = 2 complete revolutions.

    = 190.4 / 2 = 95.2 cu ft.

    Quote Originally Posted by Egon View Post
    Do i need to land on the lines of the compressor map? surge is to the left isnt it? and choke is to the right?
    Yes, yes and yes.

  4. #4
    South West Rep Evilchap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    18,016
    Rides
    0
    It sounds like you may be over-thinking this a little - trying to get it perfect. You realise once it's on, within a week you'll be fancyung more, and then more again.

    I'd suggest looking at what the MX5 guys use - TD04, T25 or T28 usually - OE Subaru or 200sx turbos. You know they work well on that sort of size engine, will be well within the efficient range when running although near the bottom of it, so you then have headroom.

    Your challenge will be pipework and ecu tuning I would say. Also, add an intercooler.

  5. #5
    Guest immy21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    7,176
    Rides
    0
    This calculator/table generator might help:

    http://www.lovehorsepower.com/joomla...d=35&Itemid=96

  6. #6
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    Heh, told you I was thinking too hard!!!
    Pipework and intercooler are a bit easier as they made a jdtm diseasal version of the 147.
    There's plenty of dead ones around!
    I can't have more yet as that's the next project! The inlet is plastic so will break up after 5psi. So might as well build a proper engine if this actually comes off!!!

    Sent from my HTC One mini 2 using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Guest R3K1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    12,176
    Rides
    0
    Is it worth it though?

    You'll easily be sinking a grand into it, at the very least.

  8. #8
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    always worth fiddling....if it aint broke, fix it til it is...
    manifold and second hand turbo, pipes, interwarmer, so far costing me less than 400 quid....

  9. #9
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,020
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Egon View Post
    always worth fiddling....if it aint broke, fix it til it is...
    No help on the topic discussion, but i really like that quote, rings true a lot of the time.

  10. #10
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    Heh, cheers Tom, as my Mrs points out to me "you buy projects, not cars"

    Ok, so after halving my cfm, I'm on the 70% efficient lines of a gt1544, which is handy as I have one in the garage...
    Got to make a 4 bolt to 3 bolt flange....cue the music....

  11. #11
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    Ok, flange being bodged er, made up...
    Another question though...
    Recirculation valve or not? With the tubby running next to no pressure, would a recirculation be a good idea? I'm not dumping, as that's just wrong.
    Do recirc valves have specific opening points like a wastegate?

  12. #12
    Guest zeppelin101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    9,760
    Rides
    0
    They are sprung and preloaded so that they only open at a certain pressure in the same way as a pneumatic wastegate.

  13. #13
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    So I'd have to get an adjustable one?

  14. #14
    No, the other one. Pete C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bath
    Posts
    23,863
    Rides
    0
    I wouldn't even bother, it'll make sod all difference and don't you want to hear some turbine stall through the air filter?

    What are you doing for fuelling, rising rate adjustable FPR and maybe some bigger injectors, try to get by on the standard map?

    1993 [L] RS13 200SX
    2003 [53] MX-5 Angels
    2004 [04] E63 645i
    SXOC Member #199

  15. #15
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Burton on Trent
    Posts
    11,209
    Rides
    0
    At 5 psi your pressure ratio is about 1.34 and the turbo speed is quite low. No possibility of any turbo damage from surge. Just fit a cone filter and let the pigeons out.

    Even 10psi won't cause any bother.

  16. #16
    Guest zeppelin101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    9,760
    Rides
    0
    In practise it doesn't really matter what pressure you run the damage caused is minimal, it would only be a problem if some form of anti-lag (remember that anti-lag never really maintains the target manifold pressure, it is pretty horrid to drive when that is the case) where the turbine is being physically driven is a problem.

    If you imagine that once you're left off the throttle the throttle blade is closed; there is no airflow through the engine and therefore no exhaust gas driving the turbine wheel so there is no adverse loading on the bearings if air were to come through the wrong way on the compressor side.

    Compare that with the turbine being loaded up and the same thing happening (i.e. genuine compressor surge) and you can see how this would be a problem as far as the loads on the central bearings go.
    Last edited by zeppelin101; 27-02-2016 at 12:28.

  17. #17
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    Cheers guys, lots of working away so no chance to get busy.

  18. #18
    Guest Egon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Old dartford towne...
    Posts
    8,649
    Rides
    0
    Flipping heck, this gets all techy, doesn't it?

    Um, my actuator appears to work backwards.. I thought they opened with positive pressure? Mine is all floppy till I suck on the tube to the actuator. Is that wrong? Am I having a blonde moment????

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •