Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Electric '67 Mustang - 0-60 in 1.9 seconds!

  1. #1
    Guest Quail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    14,371
    Rides
    0

    Electric '67 Mustang - 0-60 in 1.9 seconds!

    This vehicle is incredible.


  2. #2
    Guest Si's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zanussi service centre
    Posts
    39,280
    Rides
    0
    Holy shit.

    Slightly O/T, but I love that a Texan calls a Mustang 'small'

  3. #3
    South West Rep Evilchap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    18,016
    Rides
    0
    Mustangs are small to Americans. Crazy but true.

    That is an awesome build though!

  4. #4
    Guest Tanuki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lincolon
    Posts
    1,357
    Rides
    0
    electric s13 anyone?

  5. #5
    No, the other one. Pete C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bath
    Posts
    23,863
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tanuki View Post
    electric s13 anyone?
    I read that and instinctively wanted to cry out 'no!' and then I thought about it for a sec

    Would actually suit the character of the car really well being Japanese and all - I'd want a 5 speed sequential box like in a Formula E car

    1993 [L] RS13 200SX
    2003 [53] MX-5 Angels
    2004 [04] E63 645i
    SXOC Member #199

  6. #6
    Guest Tanuki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lincolon
    Posts
    1,357
    Rides
    0
    Yea it would be a shame to lose that boost and for it to be so quiet but that electric motor they are using with that overdrive thing is awesome!

  7. #7
    Guest R3K1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    12,176
    Rides
    0
    An electric S13 would be awesome, for all of the 5 minutes the batterys lasted

  8. #8
    Member sx rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    2,970
    Rides
    0
    that mustang is pretty! shame they look out of place in the UK, if i lived in the US I'd have a muscle car for sure.

    $125k to have that done sounds half way decent! Not to say I have that much cash knocking around but still
    Last edited by sx rider r17t; 08-10-2015 at 17:15.

  9. #9
    Guest Tanuki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lincolon
    Posts
    1,357
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sx rider r17t View Post
    that mustang is pretty! shame they look out of place in the UK, if i lived in the US I'd have a muscle car for sure.
    I totally agree, I love American/Aus muscle cars but they just look ott here for the most part. The best I could do with my sbody is stick the power plant from a Nissan Leaf or Prius in it!

  10. #10
    Member sx rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    2,970
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tanuki View Post
    I totally agree, I love American/Aus muscle cars but they just look ott here for the most part. The best I could do with my sbody is stick the power plant from a Nissan Leaf or Prius in it!
    Someone should get an electric motor in the boot and keep the CA/SR up front, I'd like to see that done!

  11. #11
    No, the other one. Pete C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bath
    Posts
    23,863
    Rides
    0
    I reckon just one of those DC motors giving 400bhp and 900 lb/ft would be pretty awesome in an S-Body, coupled to the FE 5 Speed (that thing only had two gears!) would be even better

    Come on, someone with more engineering skill than me build it

    1993 [L] RS13 200SX
    2003 [53] MX-5 Angels
    2004 [04] E63 645i
    SXOC Member #199

  12. #12
    Guest R3K1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    12,176
    Rides
    0
    The old mustangs don't look too out of place here anymore, really they're similar to a Ford Mondeo in size.

  13. #13
    Guest zeppelin101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    9,760
    Rides
    0
    Give it 5 years and someone will have fitted an e-booster onto an S body / Supra or some such to see what happens.

    http://www.valeo.com/en/our-activiti...harger-45.html

  14. #14
    South West Rep Evilchap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    18,016
    Rides
    0
    That is quite an interesting looking gadget, I wonder how long before they start appearing and being messed with?

  15. #15
    Guest R3K1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    12,176
    Rides
    0
    They've been on the market for years guys, +20BHP yo!


  16. #16
    Can't tell the difference cleanhands's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Worksop
    Posts
    2,896
    Rides
    0
    Shame it looks like it will end up in a 3 ton SUV first.

  17. #17
    Guest John Bennett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    N.E.
    Posts
    19,138
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete C View Post
    I reckon just one of those DC motors giving 400bhp and 900 lb/ft would be pretty awesome in an S-Body, coupled to the FE 5 Speed (that thing only had two gears!) would be even better

    Come on, someone with more engineering skill than me build it
    Permanent magnet AC or even AC induction motors are generally much better than DC motors (smaller, more efficient etc.). Inverter electronics are maybe a grand or two (I work for a firm that makes them ).
    But...
    That's a 1.1 megawatt lithium polymer battery!! That's where the big expense always lies with electrifying vehicles (with performance better than a milk float).

  18. #18
    Guest zeppelin101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    9,760
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Evilchap View Post
    That is quite an interesting looking gadget, I wonder how long before they start appearing and being messed with?
    Not long. Audi have one going into production soon. They are used as transient fill-ins rather than power adders. Basically you could have a massive turbo to make 200hp/l + and use an e-booster to get the boost threshold lower (BIG battery back needed for that though) or to go from vacuum to full boost in <0.5s at any engine speed. Theoretically it allows you to scale up a size in turbine housing to free up RPMs for peak power. So instead of opting for a 2871 and it getting strangled above 6000rpm because of the turbine housing, you could hit a 3071 with a slightly larger A/R and keep making power at much higher RPM.

    The tricky bit is coming up with a recharge strategy. Those things are quite thirsty and do their best work at 48V rather than 12.
    Last edited by zeppelin101; 12-10-2015 at 06:25.

  19. #19
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Burton on Trent
    Posts
    11,209
    Rides
    0
    The 11” motors are rated at 500 Amps for 5 minutes, 250 Amps for 1 hour, and 200 Amps continuous.
    500amps x 288Volts = 144 Kw x effy 0.76 = 109 Kw = 146bhp.
    The motors appear to be rated at 150bhp for 5 min. 75bhp for 1 hour and 60bhp continuous. I can't find a rating for 800bhp. Expect it is under 1 min.

    So by the end of 10 miles all he will have hanging out from under this car is a load of molten slag.

    If you think you can do a track day with this car forget it, you would have 150bhp to piss around on. OK so you do 20min sessions, may get 200bhp to play with and then dump a CO2/NO2 bottle though the motor to cool it off.

    S13 Done and dusted years ago.
    Just used 2x 9" motors and as those run 144V and not 288V 1/2 the battery.
    http://www.jouleinjected.com/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •