Page 2 of 18 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 347

Thread: Well here it is - The European Mustang !!!!!!

  1. #21
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pissing Piman off
    Posts
    4,151
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark View Post
    Although its the 2015 model i think it should be available next year, probably the latter half.

    and yes its still RWD lol. Ford tried that before and nearly got lynched my the Mustang OC
    This is fantastic news, I cannot wait to go and see one. If the V8 does make it to Britain this is the car for me.

  2. #22
    Guest 59bhp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    the five consecutive hairpins
    Posts
    2,907
    Rides
    0
    i hope this doesnt go the way of the other yank tanks and be about the same in £'s as it is in $'s

    looks awesome though.

  3. #23
    Guest zeppelin101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    9,760
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark View Post
    Yer the 2.3 is a basically a bigger version of the 2.0 thats in my ST and of course turned 90 degrees. i am confused about the V6 as well, i thought it was going to be a turbo as well and be around 350bhp but in the press release I got this morning thats not the case unless its a typo. The Official launch is due at midday and being streamed live to all employees so I will watch it and report back any other details.

    Pricewise, its rumoured to start at £28k, if thats true then i will definatly be looking at them when i replace the ST
    Thought the Ecoboost V6 was supposed to be the N/A V8 replacement? Does seem bizarre offering an N/A V6 alongside a turbo I4 which is putting our more performance. Unless it's just for the tossers who refuse to have a 4 cylinder in their muscle car in the US. Of which I imagine there are many...

  4. #24
    Engine Builder Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Bas Vegas
    Posts
    92,711
    Rides
    0
    Ok, we are not getting the V6, that the US only. So UK models will be 2.3 4 pot turbo and NA 5.0 V8, Goes on sale in the US in April but we may not get it till early 2015
    Quote Originally Posted by silverzx View Post
    I like Mark, he seems fair.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slip_n_slide View Post
    Mark is right.

  5. #25
    Engine Builder Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Bas Vegas
    Posts
    92,711
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by zeppelin101 View Post
    Thought the Ecoboost V6 was supposed to be the N/A V8 replacement? Does seem bizarre offering an N/A V6 alongside a turbo I4 which is putting our more performance. Unless it's just for the tossers who refuse to have a 4 cylinder in their muscle car in the US. Of which I imagine there are many...
    Yes that was the vibe Ford were giving out, obviously the did a Focus group and the Yanks still are not prepared to give up their V8s just yet
    Quote Originally Posted by silverzx View Post
    I like Mark, he seems fair.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slip_n_slide View Post
    Mark is right.

  6. #26
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helston, West Cornwall
    Posts
    24,438
    Rides
    0
    Yah-boo to 2015. I may have to move abroad so I can get a left-hooker

  7. #27
    Guest Si's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zanussi service centre
    Posts
    39,280
    Rides
    0
    From the other reports that I've read, the V6 will a US only car - UK is getting the 4 pot 2.3 ecoboost (which is the mid range model, v6 is bottom!) and the v8.
    And yeah. RHD.

    Prices rumoured to be starting in the late 20's/early 30's for the I4, and mid 30's for the V8.


    I think it's great - What bemuses me is that someone is launching a V8, RWD coupe, and a no doubt very tuneable 2.3 turbo, and people are whinging? What's not to like?

  8. #28
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helston, West Cornwall
    Posts
    24,438
    Rides
    0
    Who's whinging ?

  9. #29
    Guest arry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    64,839
    Rides
    0
    Damn straight!

  10. #30
    Guest Cloudy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    At the bar with the ladies!
    Posts
    5,514
    Rides
    0
    Looks good, as much as I love V8s I would have the 2.3 turbo and then tweak it. What have I just said.

  11. #31
    Guest Si's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zanussi service centre
    Posts
    39,280
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonny Wilkinson View Post
    Who's whinging ?
    Sorry, not on here - I meant on the various other forum threads I've stumbled across - 'doesn't look good enough', 'Mustang's shouldn't have a 4 pot', 'it will be too expensive', 'quality is bound to be crap' etc etc.

    It should be applauded

  12. #32
    Engine Builder Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Bas Vegas
    Posts
    92,711
    Rides
    0
    Someone on the employee blog has actually said it doesnt look radical enough !!!!


    Some people are living on another planet.

    currently listening to Bill telling us everything looks awesome in the future, just bring the cars out lol
    Quote Originally Posted by silverzx View Post
    I like Mark, he seems fair.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slip_n_slide View Post
    Mark is right.

  13. #33
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Haverhill, suffolk
    Posts
    206
    Rides
    0
    I like it. But as said the front lights look a little fairy-fied to me and I wonder if the V8 will sell much in UK/Europe

    ....Phone....

  14. #34
    Engine Builder Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Bas Vegas
    Posts
    92,711
    Rides
    0
    I dont see why the V8 wont sell, its going to be a bargain basement F type/M3 IMO. The 4 pot will be the big seller though.
    Quote Originally Posted by silverzx View Post
    I like Mark, he seems fair.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slip_n_slide View Post
    Mark is right.

  15. #35
    Head Mod Scottie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    St. Helens / Snowdonia
    Posts
    16,797
    Rides
    0
    I hope they suffer the usual Ford depreciation so they are a grea buy at a few years old. I like it.
    2004 - on : 1999 S14a 398bhp 378lb/ft
    2010 - on : 2007 RX8 PZ
    1998 - 2004 : 1991 S13

  16. #36
    Guest Si's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Zanussi service centre
    Posts
    39,280
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark View Post
    I dont see why the V8 wont sell, its going to be a bargain basement F type/M3 IMO.
    Because I'd imagine the tax band will be hideous. And that never bodes well for comparitively low cost cars - because, it appears, if you save £20k by getting a V8 Mustang over an M3, then the extra £200 a year will be a deal breaker - people are idiots

    The F Type is an interesting point, what with the 4 pot about to be introduced into the range!

  17. #37
    Guest Sidewaysfun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cambs
    Posts
    2,141
    Rides
    0
    Really like the look of this

  18. #38
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helston, West Cornwall
    Posts
    24,438
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Si View Post
    Because I'd imagine the tax band will be hideous. And that never bodes well for comparitively low cost cars - because, it appears, if you save £20k by getting a V8 Mustang over an M3, then the extra £200 a year will be a deal breaker - people are idiots

    The F Type is an interesting point, what with the 4 pot about to be introduced into the range!
    A 4-pot F-type NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooo

  19. #39
    Guest Suspect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    267
    Rides
    0
    I like, it but could/would only have it with the V8. It's a Mustang and needs the V8 sound track.

  20. #40
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helston, West Cornwall
    Posts
    24,438
    Rides
    0
    I guess it depends on how lardy it is whether it will sell as a 4-pot turbo.

    I had a V6 cooking model about 10 years ago and it was a nice car...even though it was an auto. Much better than your average yank tank. It did feel like you were sitting on the floor a bit as the bonnet was quite long and didn't slope away much so it "felt" like a big car.

    This one looks more European in shape to me. As long as it doesn't feel big and clumsy and the 300/300 output allows it to get to 60 in less than 7 and will shove you from 50-80 nicely, I reckon it should sell.

    It beats a GT86 as it has more oomph and, by the looks of it, isn't pretending to be a 4 seater.

    RWD, turbo, good looks and a sensible price coupled with RHD make it a winner in my book.

    Maybe its just me but I don't see a Mustang. I see a new S-chassis.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •