Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: MX-5 Mk2 (1.8) - talk to me...

  1. #21
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helston, West Cornwall
    Posts
    24,438
    Rides
    0
    A quick search of ebay within 50 miles of Bath served this up.

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2002-MAZDA...#ht_500wt_1180

    Also check Autotrader though you need to search for S-VT not VT-Sport because I am a fcukwit who doesn't know what his car is I'll fix the earlier posts now.
    Last edited by Jonny Wilkinson; 29-02-2012 at 14:53.

  2. #22
    Guest Jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Breeeeeestol
    Posts
    11,381
    Rides
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete C View Post
    Jonny - as it'd be a replacement for both of my cars I could go up to £4k
    You can get an S2000 for that these days (although it'd have more miles on it).

  3. #23
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helston, West Cornwall
    Posts
    24,438
    Rides
    0
    http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...ge/3?logcode=p

    This is the same car as I have and it is in Bath. 77K miles and you could probably get it for 3,500.

  4. #24
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Area 51, Norfolk.
    Posts
    6,110
    Rides
    0
    I thought of maybe getting one, but after reading the 24 MPG comment, well i get that from my Skyline with a 3.5lt engine

  5. #25
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Wiltshire
    Posts
    4,863
    Rides
    0
    My mk1 was terrible on fuel, I get better economy from a 2.0 16v Golf!
    I'm surprised to hear mk2s suffer from keyway problems though, I thought Mazda had learned that lesson with the early mk1..

  6. #26
    No, the other one. Pete C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bath
    Posts
    23,863
    Rides
    0
    Thanks for the links Jonny. Jeff, I'm aware of the S2000 but I think what I'd get for that money mostly appears to be of the canine persuasion

    That and the fuel consumption/insurance/maintenance would be a lot more. They are far prettier though, IMO of course.
    Last edited by Pete C; 01-03-2012 at 06:36.

    1993 [L] RS13 200SX
    2003 [53] MX-5 Angels
    2004 [04] E63 645i
    SXOC Member #199

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •