Originally Posted by
Jonny Wilkinson
Shelf stacking isn't a typical profession though, is it ? There is a certain basic skill in stacking shelves but most people would be able to do it and within an hour would have mastered the art.
Being a quant requires you to understand things like why one part of the area under a fat-tailed bell curve derived using a monte carlo simulation will give you a strong indication of the future cashflows on an IR swap.
So who should get paid more, a Quant or a shelf-stacker ?
Even if you set a fixed pay rate per job, I would argue its not fair.
If everyone who did a particular job got paid the same amount then someone who was good at their job would get paid the same as someone who was shit at their job. Same for someone who knows their job inside out and backwards vs a noob trainee.
So where is the incentive to learn, get better, add value ?
Its also not just about how much you get paid. Its about how you spend it and how you live. Some people manage very nicely on £40K, others struggle to keep their heads above water on 40K.