View Poll Results: Who's Bypassed their Hot Start Solenoid?

Voters
242. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes Bypassed it, to hell with those nissan engineers

    166 68.60%
  • No thought best to leave it

    16 6.61%
  • Whats a Hot Start Solenoid?

    60 24.79%
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 78

Thread: Who's Bypassed their Hot Start Solenoid?

  1. #1
    Guest GIBB0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    B'wood, Essex
    Posts
    657
    Rides
    0

    Who's Bypassed their Hot Start Solenoid?

    As the title says, Just want to get an idea of how common this is?

  2. #2
    Guest arry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    64,839
    Rides
    0
    yarr

    Although I didn't do it myself, SE Nissan did it whilst they were putting another fecked engine in

  3. #3
    Guest Sibbers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Twickenham
    Posts
    7,669
    Rides
    0
    me, actually it is very common indeed - works a treat too

  4. #4
    Flamethrower Jez's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Chieveley, Near Newbury, Berkshire
    Posts
    22,379
    Rides
    0
    get rid of it - the whole thing is just a waste of hose...

  5. #5
    committed. Jezz_S13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Swansea, South Wales
    Posts
    45,298
    Rides
    0
    mine's in the bin.

    Made no noticeable difference.

  6. #6
    Guest RADS_S13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Land of roundabouts
    Posts
    5,629
    Rides
    0
    I removed mine a couple of months or so ago.

    Sideways danny kept on thretaning to rip it out at MK

  7. #7
    Guest Stidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Swindon, Wilts
    Posts
    6,270
    Rides
    0
    mine's bypassed... and soon to return as a dodgy boost controller switchy thing

  8. #8
    Member alanjuggler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    manchester
    Posts
    9,969
    Rides
    0
    i ripped the bugger out of two actually, pulled it out of the loop in glens too
    white '94 s13 200sx scrapped - mapped to 1.45bar. OS giken box, garrett GT2876R, 950cc injectors, ORC twin plate, nistune. 349bhp/325lbft @ 1.3bar CA18DET
    white '96 s13 180sx - type g with more kouki bits - RB25DET, GTR steel twin turbo conversion, RB26 crank & rods. 2.6L VVT twin turbo, SR20 OSG box, OSG STR twin plate clutch, Z32 ECU w/ nistune.

    current status: 180 a bit broken but to be repaired.

  9. #9
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bedford
    Posts
    5,206
    Rides
    0
    sideways dannt ripped mine out to. whats difference does it make anyway?

    Paul

  10. #10
    Guest Chavbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    9,054
    Rides
    0
    Before I even drove mine I was told I didn't need it anyway, so the pipes formerly attached to it are now bodged as my DV vacuum hosing.

  11. #11
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hants
    Posts
    6,899
    Rides
    0
    Its a switch to swap the vacum connection to the top of the FRP between the airflow just behind the AFM and the back of the plenum.

    As to the point, best ask somone else!

    I voted "ditched" although i havnet got round to unscrewing it yet.

  12. #12
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Kelvedon, Essex
    Posts
    29,173
    Rides
    0
    Mine's been binned

  13. #13
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Durham / North East
    Posts
    10,072
    Rides
    0
    Yep removed mine.....well bypassed it. On the day I am sure if made a difference to my lump running but I am not sure now as its still lumpy....

  14. #14
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In The Gym
    Posts
    4,297
    Rides
    0

  15. #15
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    710
    Rides
    0
    heh, nice reply symbol.

    I also bypased FPR solenoid yesterday and it made huge difference to gas pedal response, now it feels like rocket

  16. #16
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    preston
    Posts
    8,656
    Rides
    0
    mines still in, been thinking about ripping it out but i dont know about the benifits i will gain/ what i will lose. so iv left it in for now. as the saying goes.......... if its running right, dont mess...

  17. #17
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    681
    Rides
    0
    @IRS13
    Run not walk to get rid of it.
    Why ? Here my theory about the Holy Shit Solenoid....

    Our ECU isn't aware of boost levels above 0,25 til 0,3 bar.
    The highest load map only calcs with this value.
    At every boost level above that the injectors open for
    the same time. If they are oben as example for 77% at 0,3 bar
    they are exactly 77% open at 1.2bar.
    So, where is the more required fuel ?

    The Fuel Pressure Regulator sees all values from vacuum, atmosphere
    til boost. Accordingly to this the fuel pressure before the injectors
    is changed as required. This way we get more fuel in the same time
    through the injectors.

    A little bit simplified but take a look what happens when the
    FPR sees this three states at his control hose...

    vacuum = lean
    atmosphere = rich
    boost = richer

    So if you start the car and it idles you have vacuum.
    That's fine and while idling the engine didn't need a rich mixture.
    For a Cold Start Nissan thought it would be nice to "Enrich" this
    for three minutes. So, if you start the car the solenoid is
    triggered for three minutes and instead of seeing vacuum while
    idling now the FPR sees "atmoshpere " and the mixture is richer.
    This is fine for a cold start, off course.

    But imagine you run highspeed over the highway and your tank
    is emptry. You make a tankstop. Then fire up the car again and
    because the engine is warm you gave again immediatly full throttle.

    Now comes the problem. After starting the car new the ECU again
    triggers for 3 minutes the FPR to atmoshpere. But you are on
    boost now. This boost didn't reach the FPR for 3 minutes and
    so you're not running "richer" as required. You ran damn lean.
    No fuel control anymore over the FPR.

    If you never have this worst case scenario nothing happended
    and you can let it in. You only have then 2m hose routing
    back and forth which cannot make the reaction time of the FPR
    better. The responsetime is better with a short 10cm hose.

    I had never problems with coldstarts since i removed this item.

    And when i have a rolling road session i now didn't have fear
    anymore. Before it happens that the guy there didn't let the
    engine idle 3 minutes before a power run. Now he can do it.

    Perharps someone else can measure the Hotstart Solenoid signal
    for comparison. (the 3 minute thing)
    It's long ago but i remember that my europe ECU behaves soo ...

    hope this was of any help
    cheers
    Rainer

  18. #18
    Guest muttley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    5,454
    Rides
    0
    yep mines going too

  19. #19
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    preston
    Posts
    8,656
    Rides
    0
    thats a feckin good reason to rip it out
    ill have ago at this tommorow, thanks for the explanation

  20. #20
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    681
    Rides
    0
    Yepp , the "without club" must grow

    It would be even nicer if someone could check cross the 3 minute
    thing for safety reasons ...

    .. and the "long hose - less response" part is reason enough...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •